Replication Data for: Measurement Error When Surveying Issue Positions: A MultiTrait MultiError Approach

Replication Data for: Measurement Error When Surveying Issue Positions: A MultiTrait MultiError Approach

Description

Voters’ issue preferences have been shown to be key determinants of vote choice, making it essential to reduce measurement error in responses to issue questions in surveys. This study uses a MultiTrait MultiError approach to assess the data quality of issue questions by separating four sources of variation: trait, acquiescence, method, and random error. The questions generally achieved moderate data quality, with 76% on average representing valid variance. Random error made up the largest proportion of error (23%). Error due to method and acquiescence was small. We found that 5-point scales are generally better than 11-point scales, while answers by respondents with lower political sophistication achieved lower data quality. The findings indicate a need to focus on decreasing random error when studying issue positions.
Show more

Year of publication

2025

Authors

Harvard Dataverse - Publisher

Helsinki University

Peter Söderlund - Creator

The University of Manchester

Alexandru Cernat - Creator

Kim Backström Orcid -palvelun logo - Contributor, Creator

Rasmus Siren - Creator

Other information

Fields of science

Political science

Open access

Open

License

Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication

Replication Data for: Measurement Error When Surveying Issue Positions: A MultiTrait MultiError Approach - Research.fi