undefined

P2M Simulation Exercise on Past Fuel Melting Irradiation Experiments

Year of publication

2024

Authors

D’Ambrosi, V.; Sercombe, J.; Bejaoui, S.; Chaieb, A.; Baurens, B.; Largenton, R.; Ambard, A.; Boer, B.; Bonny, G.; Ševeček, M.; Herranz, L. E.; Feria Marquez, F.; Inagaki, K.; Ohta, H.; Boldt, F.; Sappl, J.; Armstrong, R.; Mohamad, A.; Udagawa, Y.; Cozzo, C.; Klouzal, J.; Vitezslav, M.; Corson, J.; Peltonen, Jussi
Show more

Abstract

<p>This paper presents the results of the Power To Melt and Maneuverability (P2M) Simulation Exercise on past fuel melting irradiation experiments, organized within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency Framework for IrraDiation ExperimentS (FIDES) framework by the Core Group (CEA, EDF, and SCK‧CEN) and open to all FIDES members. The exercise consisted in simulating two past power ramps where fuel melting was detected: (1) the xM3 staircase power transient [ramp terminal level (RTL) 70 kW‧m<sup>−1</sup>, average burnup 27 GWd‧tU<sup>−1</sup>], carried out in 2005 in the R2 reactor at Studsvik (Sweden), where the rodlet maintained its integrity, and (2) the HBC4 fast power transient (RTL 66 kW‧m<sup>−1</sup>, average burnup 48 GWd‧tU<sup>−1</sup>), carried out in 1987 in the BR2 reactor at SCK‧CEN (Belgium), where the cladding failed during the experiment. The exercise was joined by 13 organizations from 9 countries using 11 different fuel performance codes. In this paper, the main results of the Simulation Exercise are presented and compared to available postirradiation examinations (PIE) or on-line measurements during the power ramps (fuel and clad diameters, rod elongation, pellet-clad gap, and fission gas release). Since the focus of the Simulation Exercise is on fuel melting assessment, determination of the boundary between melted/nonmelted fuel and the consequent definition of a melting radius from PIE are first discussed. During the HBC4 ramp, fuel melting was predicted by most of the codes despite differences in the melting models. Higher discrepancies were observed for the xM3 rod that can be attributed partly to power uncertainty and partly to the limited capability of the models to describe partial melting of the fuel during this ramp. Finally, possible code developments to improve simulation results are presented.</p>
Show more

Organizations and authors

Publication type

Publication format

Article

Parent publication type

Journal

Article type

Original article

Audience

Scientific

Peer-reviewed

Peer-Reviewed

MINEDU's publication type classification code

A1 Journal article (refereed), original research

Publication channel information

Journal/Series

Nuclear Technology

Volume

210

Issue

2

Pages

189-215

​Publication forum

64255

​Publication forum level

1

Open access

Open access in the publisher’s service

Yes

Open access of publication channel

Partially open publication channel

License of the publisher’s version

CC BY

Self-archived

No

Other information

Fields of science

Physical sciences; Mechanical engineering

Keywords

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Language

English

International co-publication

Yes

Co-publication with a company

Yes

DOI

10.1080/00295450.2023.2194270

The publication is included in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s Publication data collection

Yes