Impact of Rescuer Position, Arm Angle, and Anthropometric Variables on Muscle Fatigue During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: An international multicentric randomized crossover simulation study
Year of publication
2025
Authors
Sa-Couto, Carla; Sa-Couto, Pedro; Nicolau, Abel; Lazarovici, Marc; Ericsson, Christoffer; Vieira-Marques, Pedro; Bispo, Ingrid
Abstract
Background
There is a lack of studies using surface electromyography (sEMG) to objectively assess the impact of rescuer position and arm angle on muscle fatigue during CPR. Additionally, the relationship between anthropometric variables (height and weight) and muscle fatigue remains underexplored.
Aim
This study aims to objectively assess muscle fatigue during CPR by analysing triceps brachii sEMG activation during continuous chest compressions (CCs) across different rescuer positions and arm angles. A secondary objective is to examine correlations between anthropometric variables and muscle fatigue, while also evaluating the impact of CCs quality on fatigue levels.
Methods
This international, multicentric, randomized crossover simulation trial included healthcare professionals assigned to one of four rescuer positions: kneeling on the floor, standing, standing on a step stool, and kneeling on a bed. Participants performed two 3-minute trials of continuous CCs at 90° and 105° arm angles. Muscle fatigue was assessed via sEMG, while compression quality was evaluated using manikin-derived data.
Results
A total of 72 participants were included. The 105° arm angle significantly increased muscle fatigue compared to 90° (p<0.001) across all rescuer positions. Taller and heavier rescuers exhibited lower fatigue for both arm angles (p<0.05); however, fatigue levels were consistently higher at 105° than at 90°.
Conclusion
Arm angle is a key determinant of rescuer muscle fatigue, with 105° increasing fatigue compared to 90°. Rescuer position alone was not significant, though fatigue was more pronounced in kneeling and elevated positions. Taller and heavier rescuers demonstrated greater endurance but remained affected by suboptimal arm angles.
Show moreOrganizations and authors
Publication type
Publication format
Article
Parent publication type
Journal
Article type
Original article
Audience
ScientificPeer-reviewed
Peer-ReviewedMINEDU's publication type classification code
A1 Journal article (refereed), original researchPublication channel information
Journal/Series
Publisher
Volume
24
Article number
100971
ISSN
Publication forum
Publication forum level
1
Open access
Open access in the publisher’s service
Yes
Open access of publication channel
Partially open publication channel
License of the publisher’s version
CC BY
Self-archived
Yes
Other information
Fields of science
Nursing; Medical biotechnology
Keywords
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Internationality of the publisher
International
Language
English
International co-publication
Yes
Co-publication with a company
No
DOI
10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100971
The publication is included in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s Publication data collection
Yes