Choice architecture cueing to healthier dietary choices and physical activity at the workplace: implementation and feasibility evaluation
Year of publication
2021
Authors
Rantala, Eeva; Vanhatalo, Saara; Tilles-Tirkkonen, Tanja; Kanerva, Markus; Hansen, Pelle Guldborg; Kolehmainen, Marjukka; Männikkö, Reija; Lindström, Jaana; Pihlajamäki, Jussi; Poutanen, Kaisa; Karhunen, Leila; Absetz, Pilvikki
Abstract
Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mixed-methods intervention study, StopDia at Work, targeting the environment of 53 diverse worksites. The intervention was conducted within a type 2 diabetes prevention study, StopDia. We assessed feasibility through the fidelity, facilitators and barriers, and maintenance of implementation, building on implementer interviews (n = 61 informants) and observations of the worksites at six (t1) and twelve months (t2). We analysed quantitative data with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Intervention sites altogether implemented 23 various choice architectural strategies (median 3, range 0–14 strategies/site), employing 21 behaviour change mechanisms. Quantitative analysis found implementation was successful in 66%, imperfect in 25%, and failed in 9% of evaluated cases. These ratings were independent of the ease of implementation of applied strategies and reminders that implementers received. Researchers’ assistance in intervention launch (p = 0.02) and direct contact to intervention sites (p < 0.001) predicted higher fidelity at t1, but not at t2. Qualitative content analysis identified facilitators and barriers related to the organisation, intervention, worksite environment, implementer, and user. Contributors of successful implementation included apt implementers, sufficient implementer training, careful planning, integration into worksite values and activities, and management support. After the study, 49% of the worksites intended to maintain the implementation in some form. Overall, the choice architecture approach seems suitable for workplace health promotion, but a range of practicalities warrant consideration while designing real-world implementation.
Show moreOrganizations and authors
University of Eastern Finland
Pihlajamäki Jussi
Karhunen Leila
Kolehmainen Marjukka
Absetz Pilvikki
Männikkö Reija
Tilles-Tirkkonen Tanja
Laurea University of Applied Sciences
Kanerva Markus
Kuopio University Hospital
Pihlajamäki Jussi
Publication type
Publication format
Article
Parent publication type
Journal
Article type
Original article
Audience
ScientificPeer-reviewed
Peer-ReviewedMINEDU's publication type classification code
A1 Journal article (refereed), original researchPublication channel information
Open access
Open access in the publisher’s service
Yes
Open access of publication channel
Fully open publication channel
Self-archived
Yes
Article processing fee (EUR)
1731
Other information
Fields of science
Health care science; Public health care science, environmental and occupational health
Keywords
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Internationality of the publisher
International
Language
English
International co-publication
Yes
Co-publication with a company
No
DOI
10.3390/nu13103592
The publication is included in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s Publication data collection
Yes