undefined

Choice architecture cueing to healthier dietary choices and physical activity at the workplace: implementation and feasibility evaluation

Year of publication

2021

Authors

Rantala, Eeva; Vanhatalo, Saara; Tilles-Tirkkonen, Tanja; Kanerva, Markus; Hansen, Pelle Guldborg; Kolehmainen, Marjukka; Männikkö, Reija; Lindström, Jaana; Pihlajamäki, Jussi; Poutanen, Kaisa; Karhunen, Leila; Absetz, Pilvikki

Abstract

Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mixed-methods intervention study, StopDia at Work, targeting the environment of 53 diverse worksites. The intervention was conducted within a type 2 diabetes prevention study, StopDia. We assessed feasibility through the fidelity, facilitators and barriers, and maintenance of implementation, building on implementer interviews (n = 61 informants) and observations of the worksites at six (t1) and twelve months (t2). We analysed quantitative data with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Intervention sites altogether implemented 23 various choice architectural strategies (median 3, range 0–14 strategies/site), employing 21 behaviour change mechanisms. Quantitative analysis found implementation was successful in 66%, imperfect in 25%, and failed in 9% of evaluated cases. These ratings were independent of the ease of implementation of applied strategies and reminders that implementers received. Researchers’ assistance in intervention launch (p = 0.02) and direct contact to intervention sites (p < 0.001) predicted higher fidelity at t1, but not at t2. Qualitative content analysis identified facilitators and barriers related to the organisation, intervention, worksite environment, implementer, and user. Contributors of successful implementation included apt implementers, sufficient implementer training, careful planning, integration into worksite values and activities, and management support. After the study, 49% of the worksites intended to maintain the implementation in some form. Overall, the choice architecture approach seems suitable for workplace health promotion, but a range of practicalities warrant consideration while designing real-world implementation.
Show more

Organizations and authors

Tampere University

Absetz Pilvikki Orcid -palvelun logo

University of Eastern Finland

Pihlajamäki Jussi

Karhunen Leila

Kolehmainen Marjukka

Absetz Pilvikki

Männikkö Reija

Tilles-Tirkkonen Tanja

Kuopio University Hospital

Pihlajamäki Jussi

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd

Rantala Eeva Orcid -palvelun logo

Poutanen Kaisa

Vanhatalo Saara Orcid -palvelun logo

Publication type

Publication format

Article

Parent publication type

Journal

Article type

Original article

Audience

Scientific

Peer-reviewed

Peer-Reviewed

MINEDU's publication type classification code

A1 Journal article (refereed), original research

Publication channel information

Journal/Series

Nutrients

Volume

13

Issue

10

Pages

3592

​Publication forum

77023

​Publication forum level

1

Open access

Open access in the publisher’s service

Yes

Open access of publication channel

Fully open publication channel

Self-archived

Yes

Article processing fee (EUR)

1731

Other information

Fields of science

Health care science; Public health care science, environmental and occupational health

Keywords

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Internationality of the publisher

International

Language

English

International co-publication

Yes

Co-publication with a company

No

DOI

10.3390/nu13103592

The publication is included in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s Publication data collection

Yes