undefined

Combining physiological and experiential measures to study the adult learning experience

Year of publication

2022

Authors

Silvennoinen, Minna; Parviainen, Tiina; Malinen, Anita; Karjalainen, Suvi; Manu, Mari; Vesisenaho, Mikko

Abstract

This chapter introduces methods for using an individual-level multimodal approach for studying the learning experience within the context of vocational education. There has recently been increased interest in recording physiological signals in pedagogical contexts. The current research literature on multimodal studies of adult learning experience is scarce and has been primarily applied and developed in studies of a preliminary nature and with varying combinations of modalities. Learning experience is a complex phenomenon which cannot be fully captured via a single-data modality. However, based on the reviewed literature, there is still a lack of larger datasets and strong empirical evidence to enable a comprehensive understanding of experiential learning as a phenomenon. In addition to self-reported learning experiences, there is a need for theoretical development and a more holistic empirical approach that includes physiological and neurophysiological aspects involved in learning situation. We present a case example of simulation-based learning (SBL) of forestry skills, in which the modalities applied to explore the learning experience were video recordings, stimulated recall interviews, questionnaires, electrocardiography (ECG), and electroencephalography (EEG). Our example presents how multimodal research design can be used to study learning experience, by combining measurements of the human nervous system with subjective and observational data. It is too early to evaluate the practical impact of multimodal research for the field of adult education. Successful application of multimodal methods requires interaction across disciplines, harmonizing of conceptual frameworks and goals, as well as bringing together complementary, discipline-specific expertise to guarantee valid application of research methods. Opening of the disciplinary boundaries both at theoretical and methodological domains enables to increase discussion between researchers from different disciplines.
Show more

Organizations and authors

University of Jyväskylä

Vesisenaho Mikko Orcid -palvelun logo

Malinen Anita

Manu Mari Orcid -palvelun logo

Karjalainen Suvi Orcid -palvelun logo

Parviainen Tiina Orcid -palvelun logo

Publication type

Publication format

Article

Parent publication type

Compilation

Article type

Other article

Audience

Scientific

Peer-reviewed

Peer-Reviewed

MINEDU's publication type classification code

A3 Book section, Chapters in research books

Publication channel information

Parent publication editors

Goller, Michael; Kyndt, Eva; Paloniemi, Susanna; Damşa, Crina

Publisher

Springer

Pages

137-164

​Publication forum

5952

​Publication forum level

2

Open access

Open access in the publisher’s service

No

Self-archived

Yes

Other information

Fields of science

Psychology; Educational sciences

Keywords

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Publication country

Switzerland

Internationality of the publisher

International

Language

English

International co-publication

No

Co-publication with a company

No

DOI

10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_7

The publication is included in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s Publication data collection

Yes