Combining physiological and experiential measures to study the adult learning experience
Year of publication
2022
Authors
Silvennoinen, Minna; Parviainen, Tiina; Malinen, Anita; Karjalainen, Suvi; Manu, Mari; Vesisenaho, Mikko
Abstract
This chapter introduces methods for using an individual-level multimodal approach for studying the learning experience within the context of vocational education. There has recently been increased interest in recording physiological signals in pedagogical contexts. The current research literature on multimodal studies of adult learning experience is scarce and has been primarily applied and developed in studies of a preliminary nature and with varying combinations of modalities. Learning experience is a complex phenomenon which cannot be fully captured via a single-data modality. However, based on the reviewed literature, there is still a lack of larger datasets and strong empirical evidence to enable a comprehensive understanding of experiential learning as a phenomenon. In addition to self-reported learning experiences, there is a need for theoretical development and a more holistic empirical approach that includes physiological and neurophysiological aspects involved in learning situation. We present a case example of simulation-based learning (SBL) of forestry skills, in which the modalities applied to explore the learning experience were video recordings, stimulated recall interviews, questionnaires, electrocardiography (ECG), and electroencephalography (EEG). Our example presents how multimodal research design can be used to study learning experience, by combining measurements of the human nervous system with subjective and observational data. It is too early to evaluate the practical impact of multimodal research for the field of adult education. Successful application of multimodal methods requires interaction across disciplines, harmonizing of conceptual frameworks and goals, as well as bringing together complementary, discipline-specific expertise to guarantee valid application of research methods. Opening of the disciplinary boundaries both at theoretical and methodological domains enables to increase discussion between researchers from different disciplines.
Show moreOrganizations and authors
Publication type
Publication format
Article
Parent publication type
Compilation
Article type
Other article
Audience
ScientificPeer-reviewed
Peer-ReviewedMINEDU's publication type classification code
A3 Book section, Chapters in research booksPublication channel information
Parent publication name
Parent publication editors
Goller, Michael; Kyndt, Eva; Paloniemi, Susanna; Damşa, Crina
Publisher
Pages
137-164
ISSN
ISBN
Publication forum
Publication forum level
2
Open access
Open access in the publisher’s service
No
Self-archived
Yes
Other information
Fields of science
Psychology; Educational sciences
Keywords
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Publication country
Switzerland
Internationality of the publisher
International
Language
English
International co-publication
No
Co-publication with a company
No
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_7
The publication is included in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s Publication data collection
Yes